The emotional affect of ACIM on their adherents is yet another part of concern. As the course promises inner peace and spiritual enlightenment, some emotional wellness professionals have increased sensors about its potential to cause frustration, disillusionment, and even emotional harm. The course's emphasis on the illusory character of the product earth and the confidence may cause people to issue the fact of these activities and thoughts in ways that might not be beneficial. For some, this questioning can lead to a diminished capacity to manage real-world problems and associations, ultimately causing isolation and an expression of detachment from life. Authorities fight that this strategy can be particularly harmful for individuals who are previously susceptible or fighting intellectual wellness issues.

Yet another level of review is the lack of scientific support for the states created by ACIM. The course asserts that its teachings can lead to profound spiritual change and acim therapeutic, but these states are not reinforced by clinical research or medical studies. Without empirical evidence to straight back up their assertions, ACIM depends heavily on anecdotal evidence and personal recommendations, which are inherently subjective and unreliable. Having less rigorous, aim study makes it difficult to confirm the actual usefulness of the course and increases questions about its over all legitimacy.

The commercial aspects of ACIM also ask skepticism. Because their distribution, the program has spawned a multi-million dollar industry that includes publications, workshops, seminars, and on the web courses. Critics fight that the commercialization of ACIM undermines its religious concept and raises moral problems concerning the motivations of those who promote it. The high fees associated with participating in ACIM-related activities can be high for several, leading to accusations that the class is more focused on revenue than on genuine religious growth. That commercialization is visible as exploiting the religious wants and vulnerabilities of individuals for economic gain.

More over, the language and design of ACIM are often criticized for being excessively complicated and esoteric. The course's heavy and repetitive prose can be difficult to comprehend and understand, resulting in distress and misinterpretation among readers. This complexity can make a barrier to access, which makes it difficult for persons to fully interact with and benefit from the course. Some critics fight that the convoluted language is really a deliberate tactic to unknown having less substantive content and to create an dream of profundity. The problem in comprehending the product also can result in a dependence on outside educators and interpreters, further perpetuating the commercialization and possibility of exploitation within the ACIM community.