The sensible application of ACIM's teachings can also be a point of contention. While some persons record positive transformations and personal growth from following program, others discover the techniques to be ineffective as well as harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and love is admirable, but authorities argue that it may be overly easy and naïve, failing to address the complexities of individual associations and the need for limits and accountability. Moreover, the course's period and extensive character may be overwhelming for some individuals, leading to burnout or disillusionment. Authorities claim that enough time and effort required to accomplish ACIM could possibly be greater allocated to more empirically supported therapeutic methods or religious disciplines that have an established history of effectiveness.

The broader impact of ACIM on the religious and self-help neighborhoods can also be worth considering. The course has encouraged a significant subsequent and has been built-into various New Era and religious movements. But, their impact is seen as a double-edged sword. On a single give, it's presented a framework for persons seeking religious development and inner peace. On another hand, their the mystical teachings of Jesus teachings can contribute to a lifestyle of spiritual skipping, where people use religious methods to avoid working with personal and cultural issues. This will cause a form of escapism, where the concentrate on spiritual values distracts from the prerequisite of interesting with and addressing real-world challenges.

Furthermore, the industrial success of ACIM and their related materials raises ethical concerns. The growth of workshops, publications, and seminars predicated on ACIM can be seen as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual wants and vulnerabilities. Authorities fight that the commercialization of spirituality can lead to the exploitation of seekers, who might invest substantial time and money into methods that eventually don't supply on the promises. This commercialization also can subscribe to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different understandings and adaptations proliferate, possibly leading to frustration and misapplication of the principles.

Another critical aspect to take into account could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that could sometimes accompany the ACIM community. While the course it self stimulates general enjoy and forgiveness, just how it's taught and practiced by some adherents can cause a feeling of religious elitism. This will create an "us versus them" attitude, wherever those that follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while those who do not are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes may be divisive and counterproductive to the course's proposed goals of peace and unity. Experts fight that correct spiritual growth should foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to making a hierarchical variation between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.