A "class in wonders is false" is really a bold assertion that needs a strong leap to the statements, idea, and impact of A Program in Wonders (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study program compiled by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that seeks to simply help people obtain inner peace and spiritual change through a series of instructions and a thorough philosophical framework. Experts disagree that ACIM's basis, methods, and answers are difficult and fundamentally untrue. This critique frequently revolves around a few important details: the doubtful roots and authorship of the text, the difficult philosophical underpinnings, the mental implications of their teachings, and the general effectiveness of its practices.

The sources of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a clinical and study psychiatrist, said that the text was dictated to her by an internal style she discovered as Jesus acim Christ. This state is achieved with skepticism as it lacks scientific evidence and relies seriously on Schucman's personal experience and subjective interpretation. Experts fight that undermines the standing of ACIM, because it is difficult to substantiate the state of heavenly dictation. Furthermore, Schucman's skilled background in psychology might have influenced this content of ACIM, blending psychological methods with religious some ideas in a way that some find questionable. The dependence on a single individual's experience increases considerations about the objectivity and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is founded on a blend of Christian terminology and Eastern mysticism, showing a worldview that some argue is internally unpredictable and contradictory to conventional religious doctrines. As an example, ACIM posits that the product world can be an impression and that true the truth is solely spiritual. That see can conflict with the empirical and rational strategies of Western viewpoint, which stress the significance of the material world and human experience. More over, ACIM's reinterpretation of standard Christian ideas, such as sin and forgiveness, is visible as distorting core Christian teachings. Authorities disagree that syncretism contributes to a dilution and misunderstanding of recognized spiritual beliefs, perhaps leading fans astray from more coherent and historically seated religious paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM can be problematic. The class encourages a questionnaire of denial of the substance world and personal knowledge, marketing the proven fact that people should transcend their bodily living and focus entirely on spiritual realities. That perception may cause a form of cognitive dissonance, wherever individuals battle to reconcile their existed activities with the teachings of ACIM. Experts disagree that can result in mental hardship, as individuals might experience pressured to dismiss their emotions, thoughts, and physical sensations in favor of an abstract religious ideal. Moreover, ACIM's emphasis on the illusory nature of suffering is visible as dismissive of real individual problems and hardships, possibly reducing the importance of approaching real-world issues and injustices.