The practical software of ACIM's teachings can also be a spot of contention. Although some persons record good transformations and personal growth from following course, the others get the techniques to be ineffective or even harmful. The course's increased exposure of forgiveness and love is excellent, but experts disagree that it may be excessively easy and naïve, declining to handle the difficulties of human relationships and the requirement for limits and accountability. Also, the course's period and rigorous nature can be overwhelming for a lot of people, ultimately causing burnout or disillusionment. Critics declare that the time and work required to perform ACIM could possibly be better spent on more empirically reinforced beneficial methods or spiritual disciplines that have a proven background of effectiveness.

The broader influence of ACIM on the religious and self-help neighborhoods can also be worth considering. The program has encouraged a substantial subsequent and has been built-into numerous New Era and religious movements. But, their effect is seen as a double-edged sword. On a single hand, it has provided a platform for individuals seeking religious growth and internal peace. On acim one other hand, its teachings may contribute to a culture of spiritual skipping, wherever individuals use spiritual ideas to avoid coping with particular and cultural issues. This will lead to an application of escapism, where in actuality the give attention to religious beliefs distracts from the requisite of participating with and addressing real-world challenges.

Moreover, the industrial achievement of ACIM and their related resources raises honest concerns. The growth of workshops, books, and seminars based on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual needs and vulnerabilities. Experts disagree that the commercialization of spirituality may cause the exploitation of seekers, who might spend significant time and money into methods that eventually don't produce on the promises. That commercialization also can subscribe to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different understandings and changes proliferate, perhaps resulting in confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Another critical aspect to take into account is the exclusivity and dogmatism that can often accompany the ACIM community. While the class itself advances universal love and forgiveness, the way in which it is shown and used by some adherents can lead to an expression of spiritual elitism. This may create an "us versus them" mindset, wherever those that follow ACIM are regarded as enlightened, while those who do not are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes could be divisive and counterproductive to the course's supposed goals of peace and unity. Experts fight that correct spiritual growth must foster inclusivity and humility, as opposed to developing a hierarchical difference involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.