The practical program of ACIM's teachings can be a point of contention. While some individuals record good transformations and personal development from after the course, the others discover the practices to be ineffective as well as harmful. The course's emphasis on forgiveness and enjoy is admirable, but critics argue that it could be excessively basic and naïve, declining to address the difficulties of individual associations and the requirement for boundaries and accountability. Additionally, the course's length and intense nature could be frustrating for many people, leading to burnout or disillusionment. Critics claim that the time and effort expected to perform ACIM could be greater spent on more empirically supported therapeutic practices or spiritual disciplines that have an established background of effectiveness.

The broader affect of ACIM on the religious and self-help neighborhoods can also be price considering. The program has encouraged a significant following and has been incorporated into numerous New Age and religious movements. But, their effect can be seen as a double-edged sword. On david hoffmeister one give, it has presented a framework for persons seeking religious development and inner peace. On another hand, its teachings may subscribe to a tradition of religious bypassing, where individuals use spiritual concepts to avoid coping with particular and social issues. This can cause a questionnaire of escapism, where in actuality the concentrate on religious beliefs distracts from the prerequisite of engaging with and handling real-world challenges.

More over, the commercial success of ACIM and its connected products increases honest concerns. The growth of workshops, publications, and seminars based on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Authorities fight that the commercialization of spirituality may cause the exploitation of seekers, who might invest substantial time and money in to practices that ultimately do not provide on their promises. This commercialization can also contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different interpretations and changes proliferate, possibly leading to confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Another critical element to think about may be the exclusivity and dogmatism that will sometimes accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the course itself encourages common love and forgiveness, just how it's shown and practiced by some adherents can cause a feeling of spiritual elitism. This could develop an "us versus them" attitude, where people who follow ACIM are seen as enlightened, while people who don't are considered as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and counterproductive to the course's purported objectives of peace and unity. Authorities fight that correct spiritual development must foster inclusivity and humility, rather than creating a hierarchical difference between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.