Still another place of review is the lack of empirical support for the statements created by ACIM. The program asserts that their teachings may lead to profound religious change and therapeutic, but these statements are not supported by clinical research or clinical studies. Without scientific evidence to right back up their assertions, ACIM depends greatly on anecdotal evidence and personal testimonies, which are inherently subjective and unreliable. Having less arduous, goal research makes it hard to determine the actual efficiency of the class and raises questions about its over all legitimacy.

The industrial aspects of ACIM also ask skepticism. Because their publication, the class has spawned a multi-million dollar business which includes books, workshops, seminars, acim audio and online courses. Authorities fight that the commercialization of ACIM undermines its spiritual meaning and raises moral problems about the motivations of those that promote it. The high expenses related to participating in ACIM-related activities may be high for all, leading to accusations that the class is more dedicated to income than on real spiritual growth. This commercialization can be seen as exploiting the religious needs and vulnerabilities of people for economic gain.

Moreover, the language and design of ACIM in many cases are criticized for being excessively complex and esoteric. The course's dense and similar prose can be challenging to comprehend and interpret, leading to frustration and misinterpretation among readers. This difficulty can make a buffer to entry, making it problematic for individuals to totally engage with and benefit from the course. Some authorities fight that the convoluted language is just a planned method to unknown having less substantive material and to generate an dream of profundity. The difficulty in comprehending the material can also result in a reliance on additional educators and interpreters, more perpetuating the commercialization and possibility of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Furthermore, the idea of forgiveness as shown in ACIM has been criticized if you are very basic and perhaps dismissive of actual harm and injustice. The class advocates for an application of forgiveness that requires realizing the illusory nature of the observed offense and making move of grievances. While this method can be helpful in marketing inner peace and reducing particular enduring, it could perhaps not acceptably address the difficulties of certain circumstances, such as abuse or systemic injustice. Experts argue that this type of forgiveness can be seen as reducing the experiences of patients and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This could cause a form of spiritual bypassing, where people use religious methods in order to avoid coping with uncomfortable thoughts and difficult realities.