The psychological affect of ACIM on their adherents is still another area of concern. While the course claims internal peace and religious enlightenment, some psychological health experts have increased alarms about their potential to cause distress, disillusionment, and actually psychological harm. The course's focus on the illusory character of the product world and the ego can cause individuals to issue the truth of these experiences and thoughts in techniques might not be beneficial. For many, this asking can result in a decreased volume to cope with real-world problems and associations, resulting in isolation and an expression of detachment from life. Experts fight that such an strategy can be particularly dangerous for people that are presently weak or experiencing psychological health issues.

Still another point of review is having less empirical support for the claims made by ACIM. The program asserts that its teachings can cause profound religious change and therapeutic, but these states are not supported by scientific study or medical studies. Without scientific evidence to back david hoffmeister a course in miracles up its assertions, ACIM relies greatly on historical evidence and particular testimonials, which are inherently subjective and unreliable. The lack of rigorous, objective study causes it to be hard to determine the real efficacy of the class and increases questions about their over all legitimacy.

The commercial aspects of ACIM also ask skepticism. Because its publication, the program has spawned a multi-million buck market which includes books, workshops, seminars, and on line courses. Experts argue that the commercialization of ACIM undermines its religious message and increases moral concerns in regards to the motivations of people who promote it. The large costs connected with participating in ACIM-related activities can be prohibitive for several, leading to accusations that the class is more centered on income than on real religious growth. That commercialization is seen as exploiting the spiritual wants and vulnerabilities of an individual for economic gain.

Furthermore, the language and structure of ACIM tend to be criticized to be very complicated and esoteric. The course's dense and repetitive prose may be tough to know and understand, resulting in confusion and misinterpretation among readers. This difficulty can make a buffer to access, which makes it problematic for persons to fully engage with and benefit from the course. Some critics argue that the complicated language is a deliberate method to obscure having less substantive content and to generate an impression of profundity. The problem in comprehending the substance also can cause a reliance on additional teachers and interpreters, further perpetuating the commercialization and potential for exploitation within the ACIM community.