The broader influence of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help communities can be value considering. The class has encouraged a significant subsequent and has been built-into numerous New Era and religious movements. However, its impact can be seen as a double-edged sword. On a single give, it has presented a framework for individuals seeking religious development and inner peace. On one other hand, its teachings may contribute to a tradition of religious bypassing, wherever people use spiritual ideas to avoid coping with personal and social issues. This will result in a form of escapism, where in actuality the concentrate on spiritual beliefs distracts from the requisite of interesting with and addressing real-world challenges.

Moreover, the industrial success of ACIM and their connected components improves honest concerns. The growth of workshops, publications, and seminars based on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Authorities fight that the commercialization a course in miracles of spirituality may cause the exploitation of seekers, who might invest substantial time and income into methods that ultimately do not offer on the promises. This commercialization can also contribute to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous understandings and changes proliferate, potentially resulting in distress and misapplication of the principles.

Another critical part to think about may be the exclusivity and dogmatism that can occasionally accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the program itself stimulates universal love and forgiveness, the way it is shown and practiced by some adherents may cause a feeling of religious elitism. This may produce an "us versus them" thinking, wherever people who follow ACIM are seen as enlightened, while those that do not are seen as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and counterproductive to the course's purported objectives of peace and unity. Authorities argue that correct spiritual development should foster inclusivity and humility, rather than creating a hierarchical distinction between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.

The problem of whether ACIM is "true" eventually depends on one's criteria for truth. From a clinical perception, having less scientific evidence encouraging the claims of divine dictation and the course's metaphysical assertions may be reasons for skepticism. From a philosophical standpoint, the inner inconsistencies and syncretism of ACIM can result in questions about their coherence and logical validity. From the psychological perception, the potential for cognitive dissonance and psychological stress raises issues in regards to the course's affect psychological health. And from a practical point of view, the mixed benefits reported by practitioners and the possibility of commercialization and exploitation declare that ACIM's efficiency and honest standing are questionable.