A "class in miracles is false" is just a strong assertion that will require a strong jump in to the states, idea, and affect of A Class in Wonders (ACIM). ACIM, a religious self-study program published by Helen Schucman in the 1970s, presents itself as a spiritual text that seeks to simply help people achieve inner peace and spiritual transformation through a series of lessons and a comprehensive philosophical framework. Experts fight that ACIM's basis, methods, and email address details are problematic and ultimately untrue. This critique usually revolves around a few crucial details: the doubtful origins and authorship of the writing, the difficult philosophical underpinnings, the emotional implications of its teachings, and the overall efficiency of its practices.

The beginnings of ACIM are contentious. Helen Schucman, a clinical and research psychiatrist, said that the text was formed to her by an interior voice she recognized as Jesus Christ. That state is achieved with skepticism as it lacks scientific evidence and relies greatly on Schucman's particular experience and subjective interpretation. Critics argue that undermines the credibility of ACIM, as it is difficult to acim substantiate the maintain of divine dictation. Furthermore, Schucman's professional background in psychology might have inspired the content of ACIM, blending emotional methods with religious a few ideas in ways that some discover questionable. The reliance about the same individual's experience raises problems in regards to the objectivity and universality of the text.

Philosophically, ACIM is dependant on a mixture of Christian terminology and Eastern mysticism, introducing a worldview that some argue is internally unpredictable and contradictory to old-fashioned spiritual doctrines. For example, ACIM posits that the substance world is an illusion and that correct the truth is simply spiritual. This view can conflict with the scientific and reasonable approaches of American philosophy, which emphasize the importance of the product world and individual experience. Furthermore, ACIM's reinterpretation of old-fashioned Religious ideas, such as sin and forgiveness, can be seen as distorting primary Religious teachings. Authorities disagree that syncretism contributes to a dilution and misrepresentation of recognized religious beliefs, perhaps leading readers astray from more coherent and historically seated spiritual paths.

Psychologically, the teachings of ACIM could be problematic. The class encourages an application of rejection of the product world and personal experience, marketing the proven fact that persons must surpass their bodily existence and concentration only on religious realities. That perception can cause an application of cognitive dissonance, wherever persons struggle to reconcile their existed experiences with the teachings of ACIM. Experts disagree this may result in mental stress, as individuals might sense pressured to ignore their emotions, feelings, and bodily sensations and only an abstract spiritual ideal. Furthermore, ACIM's emphasis on the illusory nature of enduring can be seen as dismissive of authentic human struggles and hardships, perhaps minimizing the importance of handling real-world issues and injustices.