The practical software of ACIM's teachings is also a place of contention. Although some people report good transformations and personal development from following course, others discover the methods to be useless or even harmful. The course's emphasis on forgiveness and love is exceptional, but experts fight that it can be overly simplistic and naïve, failing to address the difficulties of human relationships and the need for boundaries and accountability. Furthermore, the course's period and rigorous character can be overwhelming for many people, leading to burnout or disillusionment. Critics declare that the time and effort needed to complete ACIM could be better spent on more empirically supported therapeutic practices or religious professions that have an established background of effectiveness.

The broader affect of ACIM on the spiritual and self-help areas can be worth considering. The course has encouraged an important following and has been integrated into david hoffmeister different New Age and religious movements. However, its effect can be seen as a double-edged sword. On one hand, it's provided a platform for individuals seeking religious growth and inner peace. On one other give, its teachings may subscribe to a tradition of spiritual skipping, where individuals use religious methods to prevent dealing with personal and cultural issues. This may result in a questionnaire of escapism, where in actuality the give attention to spiritual values distracts from the requisite of participating with and addressing real-world challenges.

More over, the commercial success of ACIM and its connected products improves ethical concerns. The proliferation of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM is seen as capitalizing on individuals' spiritual wants and vulnerabilities. Critics fight that the commercialization of spirituality can cause the exploitation of seekers, who might spend significant time and money into methods that eventually do not provide on their promises. That commercialization may also donate to the dilution of the course's teachings, as numerous interpretations and adaptations proliferate, potentially leading to distress and misapplication of the principles.

Yet another important element to consider could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that can occasionally accompany the ACIM community. As the program itself advances universal enjoy and forgiveness, the way in which it is taught and used by some adherents can result in a feeling of spiritual elitism. This could create an "people versus them" attitude, wherever people who follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while those who do not are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes could be divisive and detrimental to the course's supposed targets of peace and unity. Critics argue that correct religious growth should foster inclusivity and humility, rather than creating a hierarchical variation involving the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.