Among the major opinions of ACIM is their source story and the statements made by its purported writer, Helen Schucman. Schucman, a scientific psychiatrist, claimed that the information of the program was formed to her by an internal voice she identified as Jesus Christ. This story alone raises questions in regards to the credibility of the text, as it depends greatly on a subjective and unverifiable experience. Authorities argue that the whole basis of ACIM is based on a personal discovery that can't be substantiated by empirical evidence or external validation. This not enough verifiability helps it be hard to accept the program as a legitimate spiritual or mental guide.

More over, the information of ACIM diverges significantly from traditional Religious teachings, despite its frequent references to Religious terminology and concepts. Thedavid hoffmeister class reinterprets essential areas of Christianity, like the nature of crime, salvation, and the position of Jesus Christ. For instance, ACIM teaches that sin isn't real and that salvation is reached via a change in notion as opposed to through the atoning lose of Jesus. That reinterpretation can be seen as difficult for those who adhere to orthodox Religious beliefs, since it fundamentally alters the key tenets of their faith. The divergence from old-fashioned doctrine has light emitting diode several Christian scholars to ignore ACIM as heretical or misleading.

The mental affect of ACIM on its adherents is another part of concern. Whilst the class claims internal peace and religious enlightenment, some mental health specialists have raised alarms about its possible to trigger frustration, disillusionment, and actually mental harm. The course's emphasis on the illusory nature of the substance world and the vanity may lead people to problem the fact of these activities and emotions in techniques might not be beneficial. For a few, this pondering can result in a decreased capacity to cope with real-world problems and relationships, resulting in solitude and a sense of detachment from life. Experts fight that such an strategy can be specially harmful for people who're presently prone or fighting intellectual wellness issues.

Another position of critique is the possible lack of scientific support for the statements made by ACIM. The program asserts that their teachings may lead to profound religious change and healing, but these statements aren't supported by medical study or medical studies. Without scientific evidence to straight back up its assertions, ACIM depends seriously on historical evidence and particular recommendations, which are inherently subjective and unreliable. The possible lack of demanding, aim research helps it be difficult to determine the true efficiency of the program and improves issues about their over all legitimacy.