The useful application of ACIM's teachings can also be a place of contention. While some people report good transformations and personal development from following class, the others find the techniques to be ineffective as well as harmful. The course's focus on forgiveness and love is remarkable, but authorities fight that it may be excessively easy and naïve, failing to deal with the difficulties of human associations and the requirement for boundaries and accountability. Also, the course's size and rigorous character could be frustrating for some people, resulting in burnout or disillusionment. Experts claim that the full time and effort needed to accomplish ACIM could possibly be greater used on more empirically supported therapeutic techniques or spiritual professions that have a proven track record of effectiveness.

The broader affect of ACIM on the religious and self-help towns is also value considering. The class has encouraged a significant subsequent and has been incorporated into different New Age and spiritual movements. However, its influence can be seen as a double-edged sword. On one david hoffmeister give, it's provided a platform for individuals seeking religious development and internal peace. On the other hand, their teachings can subscribe to a lifestyle of spiritual bypassing, where individuals use spiritual methods in order to avoid working with personal and cultural issues. This can cause a questionnaire of escapism, where the concentrate on spiritual values distracts from the requisite of interesting with and approaching real-world challenges.

Moreover, the commercial success of ACIM and their connected components improves moral concerns. The expansion of workshops, books, and seminars centered on ACIM can be seen as capitalizing on individuals' religious needs and vulnerabilities. Experts disagree that the commercialization of spirituality can result in the exploitation of seekers, who may spend substantial time and money into methods that finally do not produce on their promises. This commercialization also can subscribe to the dilution of the course's teachings, as different understandings and adaptations proliferate, perhaps ultimately causing confusion and misapplication of the principles.

Still another critical aspect to think about could be the exclusivity and dogmatism that can sometimes accompany the ACIM community. Whilst the course it self stimulates general enjoy and forgiveness, the way in which it's taught and practiced by some adherents may lead to an expression of religious elitism. This will build an "us versus them" mindset, where those who follow ACIM are viewed as enlightened, while people who do not are viewed as misguided or unenlightened. Such attitudes can be divisive and detrimental to the course's proposed targets of peace and unity. Experts disagree that true spiritual growth must foster inclusivity and humility, rather than creating a hierarchical distinction between the spiritually awakened and the unawakened.