More over, the language and design of ACIM are often criticized for being excessively complicated and esoteric. The course's heavy and repeated prose can be difficult to know and understand, resulting in distress and misinterpretation among readers. This difficulty can cause a buffer to entry, which makes it problematic for people to totally interact with and benefit from the course. Some authorities fight that the complicated language is really a purposeful method to unknown having less substantive material and to create an dream of profundity. The problem in comprehending the material may also cause a dependence on external educators and interpreters, more perpetuating the commercialization and prospect of exploitation within the ACIM community.

Moreover, the idea of forgiveness as shown in ACIM has been criticized for being excessively basic and perhaps dismissive of actual hurt and injustice. The class advocates for an application of forgiveness that involves knowing the illusory nature of the perceived offense and making go of a course in miracles grievances. While this approach may be helpful in promoting internal peace and reducing personal enduring, it could maybe not adequately address the complexities of specific situations, such as for example abuse or systemic injustice. Experts disagree that this kind of forgiveness is seen as reducing the activities of subjects and absolving perpetrators of accountability. This can cause an application of spiritual bypassing, wherever persons use spiritual concepts to avoid coping with unpleasant feelings and hard realities.

The general worldview shown by ACIM, which emphasizes the illusory character of the substance earth and the pride, can be problematic. This perception may lead to an application of spiritual escapism, wherever people disengage from the physical earth and their challenges in support of an idealized religious reality. While this could offer short-term comfort or even a sense of transcendence, it may also result in a insufficient involvement with essential aspects of living, such as for instance associations, responsibilities, and cultural issues. Authorities argue this disengagement can be detrimental to both the individual and society, since it encourages a form of passivity and neglect of real-world problems.

The exclusivity of ACIM is another position of contention. The program usually occurs as an excellent religious journey, hinting that different spiritual or religious traditions are less valid or effective. This exclusivity may foster a feeling of religious elitism among adherents and create division rather than unity. Additionally, it limits the potential for persons to pull on a diverse range of spiritual assets and traditions within their personal growth and healing. Critics argue that the more inclusive and integrative way of spirituality will be more beneficial and less divisive.