The Importance of Legal Measures in Solving Violent Or Intractable Conflict

Intractable conflict is characterized by intergroup hostility and violence. It requires massive investments from rival parties and affects the lives of the people involved. It takes center stage in international affairs. Its importance is evident to both international actors and parties to the dispute. Yet, the conflict seems irreconcilable, despite multiple attempts to resolve it. This article discusses legal measures and their importance in solving intractable conflict.

Social-psychological analysis of intractable conflicts

Intractable conflicts are complex and demanding events that demand societal change. They are costly in human terms, and the people involved must endure years of pain and sacrifice before they can find peaceful resolution. Societies that experience protracted violent conflicts develop socio-psychological infrastructures that serve as the foundation of their conflict cultures. Because these systems are often ineffective in resolving conflicts, the solution must radically alter the nature of societal relations. A new, more peaceful culture must be created in order to overcome these barriers.

Intractable conflicts reveal negative universals and the difficulties of applying social science research to solving complex problems. Attempts to resolve these conflicts inevitably involve reductionist thinking and conclusions, despite their many benefits. This is because the problems are so complex and the causes are equally diverse. However, if the social-psychological analysis of intractable conflicts can reveal some of these negative universals, it can help us develop more effective conflict resolution strategies at powerlineblog

Intractable conflicts often result in massive investments from societies that are unable to resolve them. As a result, they feed the cycles of violence and cost. Furthermore, they prevent the flow of critical information needed for peaceful resolution. In addition, conflict-ridden societies are likely to reject information about the costs of fighting. And in addition, intractable conflicts are likely to destabilize society as a whole.

Rule of law

When societies are engaged in violent or intractable conflict, they invest massive resources in the management of the conflict. These investments are often viewed by outsiders as unnecessary costs of ending the conflict. However, these investments are justified as necessary sacrifices that society must make in order to achieve its goals. In many cases, societies that engage in prolonged violent conflict justify these investments with conflict-supporting narratives.

To ensure that rule of law becomes a widely shared value, society must go through a process of social transformation. De Greiff's theory suggests that there is a connection between truth and rule of law. This connection is facilitated through civic trust. Yet, in some cases, a nervous perpetrator with the power to disrupt a peace process will seek to trade truth for rule of law. This is why it is imperative to consider how to balance the competing values of truth and law in conflict resolution.

The rule of law is also crucial in post-conflict peacebuilding. 93 per cent of major armed conflicts are ethnic, religious, or intranational conflicts. While some may be resolved without making significant changes to the constitution, wars involving domestic rivalries require major reform. Rule of law has many benefits, including transparency, accountability, and limits to power. These factors reduce the likelihood of civil war for more news read at Fallenpedia.

Information about losses

When analyzing the causes of violent or intractable conflicts, it is important to understand the nature of each one. Many intractable conflicts arise from long-standing differences, inequalities, and power imbalances. These factors are often deeply rooted in a history of colonialism, ethnocentrism, racism, and sexism. These factors can also contribute to the ongoing conflict.

Research has shown that information about losses is effective in influencing the behavior of individuals involved in intractable conflicts. It also increases the willingness of those involved to consider new information and reevaluate their current position. Exposure to information about losses leads to greater support for compromise, while neutral information is not effective in this regard. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the role of information about losses in violent and intractable conflict.

Intractable conflicts are often destructive and often involve actors with particular grievances. These actors may see one another as the enemy or as a person with particular traits. When such relationships are long-lasting and rooted in deeply-rooted hatred and fear, conflict resolution is difficult. However, when there is a chance for peace, the parties involved can work out a solution and move on. The key to preventing intractable conflict is to understand what the losses are before engaging in it.